|


This Day
in History
Read
about historical events that took place today

Calendar of Events


The Inquirer Forum

A place to post
your opinions & suggestions!

New!
Free Online
Classifieds




2009 Mt.
Vernon


Monthly Column
QUICK
LINKS
Archives
 









     


|
|
|
|
03-11-09
Mayor Young’s Comments in Response to the Comptroller’s
Attack on the Inspector General
I would first like to give some background to the creation
of the office of the Inspector General. The Inspector
General’s position was contemplated and approved before I
came into office on January 1, 2008. This position was
supported and voted upon by both the city council and the
comptroller. My administration appointed Harry Stokes
to assume the position of inspector general pursuant to our
City Charter and to fill an already funded position in the
2008 Budget. The Inspector General is completely
independent and has the authority to investigate every
department in city government, including my office.
Now, to address the comptroller’s request to have Harry
Stokes removed from his position as Inspector General. The
response to that request is unequivocally no.
Elected officials are not always going to agree, but
Ms. Walker goes out of her way to hold the operational
structure of this city hostage and in the end only harms
taxpayers in reduction of service and in incurred late
fees. I am deeply disturbed that she has joined others
outside of this city to give the impression around the
county that Mount Vernon is mired in controversy and
contentiousness. The Comptroller claims to have a veto
power over payments that she simply does not legally have.
Just two examples, just last year the city was unable to
send mail for 4 days and lost internet service for several
days all because of the comptroller’s failure to pay. And
furthermore, this year, the city’s insurance coverage was
almost cancelled this year because the payments were not
made on time.
The taxpayers deserve more responsible management of
their dollars. I, as mayor, have been attempting to work
with the comptroller to improve these services, but have
been met with resistance and in many cases mean spirited
obstruction at every turn.
With the city’s best interest in mind, last year, I
asked the State Comptroller’s Office to perform an audit of
revenues of the city. They have been here since
mid-November conducting this review and we expect their
findings sometime in the summer.
Comptroller Maureen Walker is conducting herself in an
overtly political way in her attempt to destabilize and
undermine the progress of the City of Mount Vernon.
However, this is not uncommon for her. She is always first
to point the political finger at someone else and
consistently presents herself as a political victim.
All the comptroller seems to be interested in doing is
carrying out her own agenda with utter disregard for how the
failures of her office have cost the taxpayers of this city
millions of dollars. It is she who seems unqualified for
the position that she currently holds.
I have a few questions of my own:
What is the Comptroller’s substantive response to the
Inspector General’s report on abuse of power? Her
statements today included no specific denouncement of any of
the findings.
How is the Comptroller paying for the attorneys that she is
using, one of whom is the former Chief of Staff for this
city?
Why is she dedicating more time in an attempt to clear her
name rather than simply recognizing the deficiencies that
she has allowed to persist?
And separately:
What is her legal argument for delaying payment to
contracted vendors?
Why has the Comptroller made no attempt to improve the
services through the use new technology, when the
opportunities have been made readily available to her? For
example – online tax payments, utilizing the MUNIS system to
its fullest capabilities, or utilizing asset management
software.
Again, Comptroller Maureen Walker voted to create the
position, before I came into office, as part of the City’s
budget. She now wants to remove the inspector general
because she does not agree with the findings of his
investigation.
This political act is an affront to the integrity and
independence of inspector generals throughout this state.
Mr. Stokes is a highly credentialed individual and I will
not standby and have his reputation tarnished by the
Comptroller or anyone else who is trying to undermine his
position and attempt to be destructive to out city.
Harry Stokes is extremely qualified to hold the
Inspector General’s position having 18 years of trial and
appellate attorney experience and 20 years of experience in
Business in Line and Staff management positions, including
internal and external operational performance audit
experience at the Federal, State, and Local levels. He is a
Certified Inspector General by the Association of Inspectors
General, and is a member of the Association of Certified
Fraud Examiners’s Law Enforcement Partnership Program, and
completed the Institute of Internal Auditor’s Fraud Audit
Training. Again, Mr. Stokes is more than qualified to hold
his position.
A Statement from City Council President William
Randolph:
“The comptroller has thwarted an act of the City
Council and also the will of the Board of Estimate in
refusing payment to Wilson, Elser, & Moskowitz and has
therefore served as an obstructionist in city government,”
said City Council President William Randolph. “She is
essentially preventing, in a substantive way, the City
Council from pursuing its investigative powers. You cannot
have government grind to a halt because of the opinion of
one person, especially one who does not have the legal
authority to overstep city ordinance. In the end, the
Comptroller is not a government unto herself.”
|
Copyright © 2004 - 09
The Mount
Vernon Inquirer.
All Rights Reserved
Any
copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of
this service without the express written consent of The Inquirer
Media Group is expressly prohibited.
|
|
|
|